What exactly is her job?
Queen Elizabeth II is supreme governor of England, all her other titles, supremacies, prerogatives and superiorities stem from the fact she is first and foremost the Queen of England.
There are a number of people who believe that the Queen has committed treason by giving the Royal Assent to illegal moves by the Government and should be dealt with in the same way as we would deal with all the Government traitors. The ECG have always counselled against this as it could antagonise public opinion and we need the public’s support. However there is another more important Constitutional reason why we should be giving the Queen the benefit of the doubt.
The starting point of our Constitution is that all state power lies with the monarch. Without going into great detail it is suffice to say that Queen has many faces in the Constitution – The authority of the Crown is one thing, the authority of the Queen in Council is another and the authority of the Queen in Parliament is altogether different. This means that the Queen outside of Parliament ranks lower than the Queen within Parliament. Therefore only the Queen in Parliament is truly sovereign. When David Cameron says that, “Parliament is Sovereign” what he really means, but avoids saying it, is that Parliament with the Queen is sovereign. Parliament on its own isn’t anything without the Queen.
The next point is that the ‘Queen can do no wrong’ meaning that she cannot do anything of her own volition but only on the advice of her Ministers. Those who give the advice are the real decision makers and as such bear the responsibility for acting within the Constitutional law. During the stormy 17th century of revolution and civil wars the fiercest critics of the Crown would demand that, “those who gave this advice to the King must pay with their heads” rather than demand the King’s own head. However history records that the King did lose his head for treason because he was ignoring sound advice from his advisers and acted alone as he believed he ruled by divine right and therefore illegally.
When the Royal Assent is given to a new Act of Parliament it is prefaced with:
‘Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—’
However the reality is that the Queen no longer actually gives the Royal Assent personally, which she should, but she is used by the Government as a rubber stamp. Again this state of affairs gradually came about as a direct assault on the Monarch’s authority by successive traitorous Governments.
Much of this information came from Gerad Batten’s book ‘Inglorious Revolution’. You can get it from Amazon HERE at £7.19
When George the VI unexpectedly became King after the abdication of Edward VII, which incidentally was unconstitutional, Princess Elizabeth would then be next in line to become Queen. She received her education from Sir Henry Kennett Marten KCVO, Provost of Eton and who was a Fabian. We believe that she was told that she had no powers at all and was merely to be a figurehead. We do not know what kind of pressure she would have been under but we do believe that all her actions in apparently approving membership of the EEC/EU were due to her treasonable education. There are those who believe the Queen has committed treason but until we have our country back we will not know. Many people have written letters to the Queen imploring her to stand-up for her rights and bring this treasonous Government to account for their actions, but the letters are re-directed to various Government departments where they are ignored. The Queen needs all the support the public can give her until we are able to sort out who did what.
Constitutionally the Monarch is head of state and has the final say on all laws passed by Parliament, the Monarch has the absolute right to accept a Bill passed by both houses to reject or return a Bill for amendment. The sovereign is the fount of all law in this Kingdom. There is no other Kingdom or person on the face of this planet to whom the Kings of England take second place. Not now or ever.
That is the constitutional position, the facts as they are today are very different, and since 1714 the House of Commons has been on a power grab. They claim as the elected house sovereignty lies with them and not the Crown. They are quite wrong! Sovereignty lies, as it always had, with the Crown. This was confirmed after a vote in the House of Commons after King George III had fought a twenty year running fight with the Commons as to who was Sovereign. Was it the King or the Commons as the elected house? The King won the vote and was confirmed as a fully Sovereign King. The House of Commons then withdrew their claim to be Sovereign. Indeed any other result would have hanged them all for high treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act.
We are told by Parliament that the last time a Bill was rejected by the sovereign was in 1707 when Queen Anne rejected the Scottish Militia Act. This is far from the truth! Queen Victoria refused a Bill on homosexuality, because it contained references to lesbians. This was on the grounds that she did not believe women could engage in such activity. The Bill had to be rewritten with all reference to lesbianism removed before it received the Royal Assent. King Edward VII refused, what became the 1911 Parliament Act, because it was unconstitutional and removed a protection from his subjects.
Since 1960 the Royal Assent has been granted by a committee of 5 Barons appointed by the Government of the day to give what has become known as the automatic assent. This is constitutionally unlawful.
How did we reach this sorry state?
It started a long time ago in 1609 when the House of Commons first tried it on when they wrote to the House of Lords claiming to be the Knights, Burgess’s, and Barons of the High Court of Parliament. The House of Lords replied saying they would never accept the commons as Barons and without them they were no court.
Next in 1667 the House of Commons told the House of Lords they could not amend a money bill. A ten year argument between both houses ensued until in 1677 when the House of Lords agreed not to amend any money bills. This was the start of the problems we have today.
In 1714 Queen Anne died and King George I came to the Crown he spoke no English and so unlike all previous Kings and Queens he did not attend parliament or cabinet meetings. This meant the Government of the day in the commons were left to do as they liked. King George II spent his entire reign complaining that his Ministers were Kings in his Kingdom and he was discouraged from attending Parliament or Cabinet meetings. We know that King George III fought back and in part reversed that trend.
We have already dealt with Queen Victoria and King Edward VII above.
When King George V came to the Throne he was told by a Government Minister that he kept all his prerogatives but could not use any of them unless he had the backing of a Government Minister. When the King accepted this it was the final nail in the coffin of England. At the same time Asquith put through the 1911 Parliament Act which purported to remove, from the House of Lords, their ability to reject a Bill. We then had a situation where Asquith, a Fabian Prime Minister had usurped the Royal Prerogative; a clear act of high treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act. This was also an act of the subversion of the constitutional arrangements of Parliament and the 1911 Parliament Act being a clear case of high treason. This was against the Constitutional arrangements of Parliament at English Common Law. This applied to the 1999 House of Lords Act which removed the hereditary Peers from their rightful place in Parliament. Every Parliament since 1911 has been an unlawful assembly and all laws passed by it are void under English Common Law.
This is why our work of pursuing the police into prosecuting those who purport to be Government Ministers over the last 40 years for high treason is so important to us and our children and their children.
What is our Object?
Our object is to get England back under the rule of English Common and Constitutional Law.
It means bringing to justice all those past and present traitors in the Palace of Westminster.
Our intention is to hand England back to Queen Elizabeth II and to see she is re-educated back into the English Constitutional and Common Law.
To reconstitute Parliament, as our forefathers intended, with all its checks and balances in place for our protection.
To reject all foreign interference in England and to withdraw from the EU and cease all further payments.
To stop all foreign aid until after we have rebuilt our infrastructure and Armed Forces.
To redefine the role of our police from being an army of occupation to a traditional English Bobbies. We do this by going back to a tradition uniform and losing the CS sprays and Tasers which are turning our police into thugs. They would rather beat the common man to a pulp than arrest the real criminals in Parliament and banking. It will be a priority for our police to round up all illegal immigrants and foreign criminals and those who have British Nationality will have it removed from them prior to being deported. This will include anyone who threatens our national security or the safety of our children through rape.
This is a Christian Kingdom and only Christianity will be taught in any of our schools as religious education. Other faiths can be taught but as a geography lesson whilst learning about foreign countries and their cultures. The teaching of Islam, particularly in their treatment of women, is alien to our entire belief structure and will not be allowed. Mosques, which are breeding grounds for terrorist activity in a number of cases, will be banned as a serious threat to our internal security. Only Common and Constitutional law will be permitted in this Kingdom. Sharia law is alien to our religion and culture and will be outlawed. Any attempt by a British National to use Sharia Law will be considered treason against the English Common and Constitutional law and will be prosecuted according to the law. To this end all equality and human rights laws will be declared void as Common Law already gives more than enough protections for the individual.